So I decided to debate Yongye response to a seekingalpha article lol, I cant even start how odd it is for a listed nasdaq company ceo to be even looking at seekingalpha, not to mention respond to one, but here we go. Here's there response.
http://bit.ly/fJD3NH
1)You say your distributers quarter fluacuate and are variable, but you are in the farming business which is a traditionally seasonal business. In fact its the orginal seasonal business. Its basically plant,seed, sow, and begin again. If farmers receiave their product late or in wierd variable periods, how could they possibly use your product, it should be consistant. And you say you work closely with farmers and distributers, and your the ceo of a business that depends on them so why would you say "Our distributors' buying habits are their business." Its your business and ours to know why, and the reason you depend on them, and for good business maybe help them unvariable it. It's common sense.
2)In the past your company said each support staff works with stores and even on the farmer level to quote your 10k " We overlay this sales and support network on top of our store and distributor network in a way that our sales and support staff are project managers who oversee three to ten stores each depending upon their region and capability level", and your support staff help farmer educate on the use of your product, organize education forums with professors, also at the same time giving support to stores. I don't understand how you can have so few workers, doing all of those jobs, and giving support to even distributers.
3)You say you rely on contract manufacturers. Why not give out the numbers of contract workers. And the production process is supposivly a trade secreat, and would need a level of skill work. And with the production process increase from 2k to 35k , and to multiple facilties, wouldnt you need a far larger work force at least to handle the production process. In 2008 you had 60 workers in 2010 189.
4)You say we shouldnt know the name of the distributers, that the audit firm knows who they are. You said this company stands for corporate governance, if shareholders are fretting over unknown distributers, and in a age where chinese reverse merger stocks are under scrutinty and in the sake of shareholder governance shouldnt you tell shareholders.
5)You gave away 5% of the company to an unknown distributor. Again under shareholder corporate governance, we deserve to know who you gave it to. It is great you told the auditor, but they are not the owners of yongye shareholders are the owners.
6)The problem is that we don't have much information on these multiple related parties to yongye or their principals. Like i said yongye saids it stands for corporate governance,we deserve to know more about the relationships.
LOL thats my rebuttal.......I just want to know more.